Information Architecture for Organizations: An Ontological Approach

Authors: Almeida, Pessanha & Barcelos
Publication: Ontologies in Information Science (InTech, 2017)

Core Framing

The paper asks: What kind of entity is a corporation? Using formal ontology (specifically BFO, Basic Formal Ontology) to answer this question reveals that organizations must be understood through two dimensions:

  1. Descriptive dimension: The structure of units, subunits, and members
  2. Normative dimension: The duties, obligations, and responsibilities that distinguish organizations from other aggregates

The key insight: Corporations differ from ant colonies because they have normative partitions (document acts that create and sustain social reality).

Key Theoretical Tools

  • BFO (Basic Formal Ontology): Top-level ontology for categorizing entities
  • Granular Partition Theory: Framework for understanding how cognition divides reality into units
  • Document Acts Theory: Extension of speech act theory explaining how documents create social entities

Primary Contributions

  1. Corporations are non-summative aggregates: they preserve identity despite member changes
  2. Organizational units are fiat objects: they exist because of human demarcation, not natural boundaries
  3. Documents don’t merely record social reality, they constitute it
  4. Speech acts are ephemeral; document acts provide temporal extension for organizational commitments

Extracted Content

Atoms

Molecules

Relevance to heyMHK Domains

Knowledge Engineering: The bona fide/fiat distinction is fundamental for ontology design: knowing which entities exist independently vs. which exist by human convention.

Information Architecture: Granular Partition Theory provides a formal foundation for taxonomies and organizational structures.

Cross-domain: The document acts framework connects organizational design, knowledge management, and semantic web applications.