Contextual Disambiguation in Classification

Job titles alone are often insufficient to classify occupations. “Architect” could mean software architect, building architect, or solutions architect, completely different roles requiring different skills.

ESCO’s ML approach demonstrates that adding contextual information (tasks, required knowledge, skills mentioned) dramatically improves classification accuracy. The model learns to weight these contextual signals appropriately.

Helpful context:

• Tasks performed (“design building layouts” vs. “design system architecture”)
• Required knowledge domains (“structural engineering” vs. “cloud computing”)
• Skills mentioned in job descriptions

Noise to filter:

• Employer descriptions
• Benefits packages (mentions of “medical insurance” could misleadingly suggest healthcare roles)
• Application procedures
• Salary information

Key insight: A robust classification model needs to be noise-resistant. Real-world job postings contain substantial content irrelevant to occupational classification that could skew results if not handled carefully.

This applies beyond labor markets: any classification task on unstructured text needs to distinguish signal from noise.

Related: [None yet]