Writer-to-Cultivator Shift

In generative game design, the writer’s role is fundamentally changing, from scripting dialogue trees to creating “character seeds” and guardrails that shape LLM improvisation.

Traditional narrative designers wrote branching scripts: if player says X, NPC responds Y. Exhaustive, brittle, limited.

Generative NPC designers create something different: a character’s backstory, motivations, linguistic style, knowledge boundaries, then iteratively “condition” and “guide” the LLM through testing. The writer becomes a director and curator, not a scriptwriter.

Ubisoft’s NEO NPC project exemplifies this. Writers create detailed “character bibles” that define who the NPC is. They don’t write the dialogue. They write the constraints within which dialogue emerges.

The core skill shift: from writing content to writing the conditions that generate good content.

This pattern extends beyond gaming. Any domain where LLMs generate user-facing output faces the same transition: from creating the output directly to creating the constraints, prompts, examples, and guardrails that shape emergent output.

The writer doesn’t disappear, but what they write changes fundamentally.

Related: [None yet]